First interview with new CEO NeoMedia coming here!
So, I have been promised the first interview with Iain McCready new CEO of NeoMedia.
If you have any questions - let me know!
Related News:
So, I have been promised the first interview with Iain McCready new CEO of NeoMedia.
If you have any questions - let me know!
Related News:
15 Responses to “First interview with new CEO NeoMedia coming here!”
Bena
Comment made on May 27th, 2008 at 4:25 pmPlease ask him if he has a time frame in mind for lighting Neomedia fuse. It seems to have been wet for a very long time.
Look forward to your interview. Do you have a date set yet?
Thanks
Larry
BOTTOM LINE
is neomedia ever going to make us any money thats what we all want to know.
the hell with all the other stuff
Comment made on May 27th, 2008 at 4:37 pmjust get a answer to that
What will Iain do differently regarding an immediate revenue producing strategy that the past 3 CEO’s didn’t do and why should current investors wish to remain loyal after catostrophic losses while new investors shun the stock due to serial dilution and non-stop conversionary practices by Yorkville Associates?
Thanks, JP
Comment made on May 27th, 2008 at 5:31 pmHere’s my question:
WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON WITH NEOMEDIA?????!!!!!!!
Comment made on May 27th, 2008 at 7:25 pmHi Bena,thanks for making this interview possible…
my questions..
will the new CEO communicate with shareholders via CC,SHM,etc.
will the Neoreader be preinstalled on any phone by-let’s say- End 2008
and..
is there a revenue projection possible for 2008 and further on…
thanks and regards!
Comment made on May 27th, 2008 at 11:08 pm1. As the former and very well respected CEO of Mobiqa, what made Iain decide to come to work for NeoMedia Technologies and assume the leadership role as CEO?
2. With Scanbuy using the indirect encoding method for their barcode resolution process, what are Iain’s thoughts on Scanbuy continuing to infringe on NeoMedia’s patents? Does he intend to pursue continued litigation against Scanbuy?
3. I think I speak for all of us when I say that myself and the rest of the NeoMedia shareholders have lost hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars, over the last 2 years in what has become a financial nightmare for all of us. A lot of really good hearted, honest, and hard working people have been literally fleeced and wiped out financially as we have watched our stock price plummet to an embarrassing $0.003.
We would like to know what Iain plans to do to land revenue generating deals, monetize the patents, and to help get our stock price back up to a much more respectable number.
Thanks & best regards
Comment made on May 28th, 2008 at 12:03 amOK - so I got an email yesterday from YA and now am going to arrange a time with Iain - hopefully this week.
thanks for all the questions - I am going to send him this link today so if you have any more - tell me.
Comment made on May 28th, 2008 at 12:09 amBena
Bena,
The most important question hasn’t even been mentioned, so I will mention it at the end of my post here. First I want to address some of the comments made by others though.
The patent situation is irrelevant at this time, especially for a new CEO, since the outcome is in the hands of the USPTO and the re-exam process. The new CEO can do nothing about that now except sit and wait like everyone else. Then comes the lengthy court battle . So Neom does not have the time to worry about the patent outcome.
Then one commenter mentions hard working investors being fleeced. He forgot to mention that some of us hard working investors tried to warn others over 2 years ago and we were attacked by himself and his group, and banned from posting in that forum. Now he would have everyone believe that all the investors got fleeced by the companies actions. Not true. many got fleeced by a message board that shut up those that predicted exactly whats happening today.
As to what should be asked of the new CEO, there are two critical questions. What are they going to do for funding going forward, since any chance of success financially is at least a year out. Producing revenue as one commenter mentioned is not enough, when your expenses exceed the revenue and i expect as revenue grows so will operating costs. Neom needs to get to profitability to start down paying the enormous debt, and thats a couple years out at best in my honest opinion. In the mean time they need cash and these monthly loans by YA at ridicules costs are not going to get them there.
And secondly how are they going to hire the sales staff some of us have been asking for for two years now, so they can increase sales, when they don’t even have the cash to operate month to month, without loans from YA?
And third, when do they intend to comply with the state laws they are incorporated under and hold the shareholder annual meeting they are already violating that law by not having. Its been 2 years since the last one and deleware law is clear on when these meetings must occur.
Comment made on May 28th, 2008 at 12:57 amWatching ‘Fast Money’ on CNBC on May 27,2008 I heard that Google has an application for barcode scanning. Does NEOM have any involvement with Google in this? If so will we see any revenue and if not is NEOM prepared to take on Google in a patent infringement case?
Comment made on May 28th, 2008 at 7:07 ambrewskih, as u know, the admins have the final say on the neom message board. u were banned from the board for your constant personal attacks and rule violations. u may have predicted the right outcome, but u were your own worst enemy and got yourself kicked off the board.
Comment made on May 28th, 2008 at 3:10 pmHi Kevin,
I think you gave him too much credit for his predictions.
Wednesday, November 29, 2006 at 12:45:52 PM
Brewskih said:
“Based on what I know now, which is subject to change of course in either direction, based on new developements here are my opinions for 2007.
The pps by the end of 2007 will be in the .30 - .50 range.”
Comment made on May 29th, 2008 at 1:27 pmIain contacted me last night - we have an interview next week.
Comment made on May 29th, 2008 at 10:55 pmgreat,thanks for the update Bena!
Comment made on May 30th, 2008 at 5:57 amJust wanted to be clear as I see other’s feel the need to ‘have to’ comment on others’ comments.
That said, this technology is a blow away, plain and simple! The technology does work and is well utilized and is already revenue producing in certain parts of the world. Granted, there have been many obstacles to its coming, both financial, cultural, regulatory as well as technical challenges. It is not an overnight success, nor did it ever claim to be one. It is dependent on carriers, OEM’s, integrators, aggregators, web enablers, content providers and brand partners, to name a few. There are many involved in the vertical makeup of this technology and all have to be playing in tune and in harmony with eachother in order for it to achieve any modicum of success.
Funding is always a key issue, but it comes on the prediction (pro forma) of revenue generation. Thats the whole principle behind VC lending if you’re privately held or equity stock distribution if you are publicly traded. Bottom line, you put alot of upfront risk capital with the intention of reaping much bigger rewards later down the road as you assist your fledgling start-up attain (VC hurdle rates or milestones to) profitability.
Secondly, while the patents are under review and continue to consume time, they are nonetheless and integral and important part of the entire makeup of the company. While the subject CEO may not be well diversified in legal matters or have the educational acumen to drive the legal battle, indeed there are attorneys who are working these ropes, thereby freeing the CEO to concentrate on other more important business matters, such as running the day to day operations.
With regards to being banned form other forums, there is an administrator/owner of that forum who ultimately felt it in the best interest of all to permanently remove certain problematic posters, all of which had nothing to do with the moderators there. In essence, what we don’t need is a selp-appointed egocentric savior to save us from ourselves. What we do need is for NeoMedia to develope a successful business plan and to consistently execute on that model, funded by non-toxic dilutive backing…preferably by one of the REAL players within the PWC space who know the mobile barcode industry and can help shape its inevitable future…and we need it now.
Comment made on May 31st, 2008 at 1:57 pmI wasn’t going to comment on the bogus remarks here about why someone was banned from and IHUB stock board, until JP, AKA Houdini, felt the need to add hi8s remarks as a now ex moderator of that site.
Yes there are administrators there, who were very upset that a certain poster ousted the moderators behavior in another financial web site called YAHOO, and i have the emails to prove it. But besides that to suggest the moderators have no effect on posters is pure garbage. The moderators are the ones removed viable posts they don’t like, and they are the ones launched the campaigns for every one to email the administrator to get certain posters banned. And yes when there are 100 posters emailing the administrator, compared to the one constantly being attacked, the administrator sees the one as the problem. Through his own admissions, he does not go back and read the threads to see who said what or when. That admission can be found in his own lobby message board for anyone wishing to see.
Then he bans posters for responding to someones attacks, and then tells that poster its not their problem what they other poster did, who launched the attack. He says his actions are against you for violating the rules. So he selectively enforces the rules and that can be found in the same lobby forum. He allows the attacker to keep posting and tells the one who responded its that he is being punished for his behavior, and not to worry why the attacker wasn’t punished.
As for DLETHE01’s remarks, maybe he should reread my prediction. It was based on the information at the time, before NEOM sold the subs at huge losses, and had to borrow many more millions just to pay off the new owners in the sale. That is why I qualified that prediction with the statement that it could very well change WITH NEW DEVELOPEMENTS.
Comment made on June 2nd, 2008 at 8:24 amLeave a Comment